Short-term responsive mating intentions increase with estradiol and testosterone across the menstrual cycle: scale development and an observational study
Date
2024Author
Zugic, Kaitlyn E.
Teatero, Missy L.
Phillips, Maggie
Oinonen, Kirsten A.
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
The extent to which estradiol, progesterone, and testosterone influence mating behavior
across the menstrual cycle is unclear. The Proactive and Responsive Mating Strategies Scales
(PARMSS) were developed to separately examine two specific components of sexuality and were
used here to test divergent hormonal associations. Preliminary psychometric data (N = 364 females)
suggest that both scales consist of one factor and demonstrate strong psychometric properties (internal
consistency, test–retest reliability, and construct and convergent validity). The PARMSS were
used in a repeated-measures observational study to examine the relationships between changes in
endogenous hormone levels and both proactive and responsive mating intentions with potential new
short-term or long-term partners in healthy pre-menopausal participants (N = 38). At two points
in their cycle, participants provided salivary hormone samples in the laboratory and reported the
likelihood of engaging in proactive and responsive behaviors with men in photos and vignettes.
Participants reported greater responsive than proactive intentions. Increases in estradiol and testosterone
across the cycle were associated with increases in short-term mating intentions, particularly
responsivity to potential short-term relationship partners. No associations were found for intentions
that were proactive or that involved potential long-term partners or for progesterone. Changes in the
three hormones explained changes in short-term responsive mating intentions (22% of the variance).
The results suggest (a) cyclical changes in estradiol and testosterone are differentially associated
with changes in responsive vs. proactive mating intentions and (b) context-dependent changes (i.e.,
short-term vs. long-term mating intentions and possibly relationship status). The findings require
replication with larger and diverse samples.